Deus Ex Machina: The Influence of Polling Place on Voting Behavior
Abstract
Voting is perceived as free and rational. Citizens make whatever choices they wish, shielded from external influences by the privacy of the voting booth. The current paper, however, suggests that a subtle source of influence—polling places themselves—can impact voting behavior. In two elections, people voting in churches were more likely to support a conservative candidate and a ban on same-sex marriage, but not the restriction of eminent domain. A field experiment found that people completing questionnaires in a chapel awarded less money (relative to people in a secular building) to insurance claimants seeking compensation for abortion pills, but not to worker's compensation claimants. A laboratory experiment found that people subliminally exposed to ecclesiastical images awarded less money (relative to people exposed to control images) to abortion pill claimants, but not to worker's compensation claimants. Exposure to ecclesiastical images affected only Christians; non-Christians' awards were unaffected by the prime. These findings show that polling locations can exert a powerful and precise influence on political attitudes and decision making.
REFERENCES
- Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18–28.
- Baldwin, M. W., Carrell, S. E., & Lopez, D. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the Pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435–454.
- Berkowitz, L., & LePage, A. (1967). Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 202–207.
- Bless, H., Mackie, D. M., & Schwartz, N. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585–595.
- Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1 , 319–322.
- Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: how political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388–405.
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112 , 155–159.
- Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of voting. New York: Harper.
- Druckman, J. N. (2004). Priming the vote: Campaign effects in a U.S. senate election. Political Psychology, 25, 577–594.
- Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Judgments of personality based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398.
- Green, J. C. (2003). A liberal dynamo: The political activism of the Unitarian-Universalist clergy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 577–590.
- Green, J. C. (2007). Religion and the presidential vote: A tale of two gaps. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, August 21, 2007. Available at http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=240.
- Hassin, R. R., Ferguson, M. J., Shidlovski, D., & Gross, T. (2007). Subliminal exposure to national flags affects political thought and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19757–19761.
- Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). The Scrooge Effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1342–1353.
- Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Karp, J. A., & Banducci, S. A. (2000). Going postal: How all-mail elections influence turnout. Political Behavior, 22, 223–239.
- Kay, A. C., Wheeler, S. C., Bargh, J. A., & Ross, L. (2004). Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 83–96.
- Kemmelmeier, M., & Winter, D. G. (2008). Sowing patriotism, but reaping nationalism? Consequences of exposure to the American flag. Political Psychology, 29, 859–879.
- Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. The American Political Science Review, 84, 497–512.
- LaBar, K. S., & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Reinstatement of conditioned fear in humans is context dependent and impaired in amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119 (3), 677–686.
- Layman, G. (1997). Religion and political behavior: The impact of beliefs, affiliations, and commitment from 1980 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 288–316.
- Lugo, L., Kohut, A., Stencel, S., Green, J., Smith, G., Pond, A., Morin, A., Keeter, S., Doherty, C., Dimonck, M., Funk, C., Wike, R., Samaranayake, N., Craighill, P., Kennedy, C., Rapp, A., Horowitz, J., & Suls, R. (2006). Most want middle ground on abortion: Pragmatic Americans liberal and conservative on social issues. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, August 3, 2006. Available at http://pewforum.org/publications/surveys/social-issues-06.pdf.
- Markus, G. B., & Converse, P. E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. The American Political Science Review, 73, 1055–1070.
- Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301–315.
- Miller, A., & Wattenberg, M. (1984). Politics from the pulpit: Religiosity and the 1980 elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 301–317.
- Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 91, 567–583.
- Petersen, L. R., & Takayama, K. P. (1984). Religious commitment and conservatism: Toward understanding an elusive relationship. Sociological Analysis, 45, 355–371.
- Pyszczynski, T., Wicklund, R. A., Floresku, S., Koch, H., Gauch, G., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (1996). Whistling in the dark: Exaggerated consensus estimates in response to incidental reminders of mortality. Psychological Science, 7, 332–336.
- Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. The American Political Science Review, 62, 25–42.
- Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory I: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681–690.
- Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342–353.
- Stellway, R. J. (1973). The correspondence between religious orientation and socio-political liberalism and conservatism. The Sociological Quarterly, 14, 430–439.
- Stewart, T. L. (2004, October 19). Cowboys fans can't show colors at polls. Dallas Morning News.
- Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.
- Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. The American Political Science Review, 96, 75–90.
- Weisbuch-Remington, M., Mendes, W. B., Seery, M. D., & Blascovich, J. (2005). The psychological influence of stimuli outside of subjective awareness during motivated performance situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1203–1216.
- Wilson, T. D., Hodges, S. D. & LaFleur, S. J. (1995). Effects of introspecting about reasons: Inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 16–28.
- Wis. Act. 105 § 12.03 (2005).
- Wittman, D. (1989). Why democracies produce efficient results. The Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1395–1424.
- Zucker, G. (1999). Attributional and symbolic predictors of abortion attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29 (6), 1218–1245.